|
Post by blake on Mar 4, 2007 17:38:31 GMT
the best looking girls are taken the best looking girls are staying inside The best looking boys are on the internetz quoting Belle and Sebastian songs.
|
|
|
Post by alice in wonderland on Mar 4, 2007 17:55:35 GMT
I think a lot of people get confused between sexual attraction and knowing someone's attractive; I've recognised a fair few pretty ladies on this forum, but I've never wanted to get freaky with any of them. Sorry to disappoint, etc. Word. I can tell when a guy is good looking. Like Oats for example he's fit. But I have no desire to stick my willy up his or anyone elses bum (or kiss or generally get frisky.. you know what I mean). See? Thats why all you ladies like gay blokes, far to classy to say anything as crude as that. nah thats not true.. id be quite happy to get with some gay blokes i know haha
|
|
|
Post by blake on Mar 4, 2007 18:25:54 GMT
Eh? You misunderstand me Alice.
|
|
|
Post by Elderberry Fucking Fanta on Mar 4, 2007 18:31:06 GMT
the best looking girls are taken the best looking girls are staying inside The best looking boys are on the internetz quoting Belle and Sebastian songs. whoa, get a room we two.
|
|
|
Post by Clare on Mar 4, 2007 18:51:47 GMT
the best looking girls are taken the best looking girls are staying inside I <3 Belle & Sebastian. But is it not the best looking boys are taken? *B&S freak.* I am also pretty much married to a B&S freak. That brings me to my frustration. Last year, I met a lovely boy whilst camping (he's a big Patrick Wolf fan too, but we had a passionate debate about TMP, which he dislikes ) at a hippie commune in the middle of Scottish countryside. Unfortunately, I live in Glasgow, he lives in Aberdeen (laaaaame). Well, live d in Aberdeen. He's currently away on a six month trip to India. When he comes back, he'll be back in Abers for a couple of weeks, and then he's moving to the Weege for permanents to go to uni. We're pretty serious about each other. He took me home to Aberdeen to meet his folks, who were nice to me. So, yeah, he's pretty serious about me. So far he's not met my family. It's just frustrating because he's been away for two weeks and it's like he's been gone forever. I mean, previously, due to the distance, we didn't see each other much, once or twice every couple of months. Still, at least he was in the same country (only four hours away on the bus!). We're not really together (never have been - he was great at the casual sex thing until he met me, apparently). We were just sort of seeing each other until he went away. I went to stay with him for a few days in early January, and he was all, "Yeah, I understand you have your needs... So if you want to see other people when I'm away, I'll understand. If you end up being with one of them seriously and you don't want me when I come home, I'll understand. Be heartbroken, but I'll understand. But I want you to know that I have been completely faithful to you." ... Yeahhhhhh. How am I supposed to respond to that? Anyway, yeah, that's one part of the huge saga that is my lovelife. Other threads and strands of it floating about here and there that I am mostly trying to ignore in the name of concentrating on passing the exams that I have coming up. It's very difficult. My body is like, "Rarr, go out and make babies! Get sex, go!" Finally, I am a genuine bi/pansexual, having been in serious relationships and casual relationships with both sexes and some people who don't quite qualify as either. High five for me.
|
|
|
Post by Elderberry Fucking Fanta on Mar 5, 2007 22:13:00 GMT
the best looking girls are taken the best looking girls are staying inside I <3 Belle & Sebastian. But is it not the best looking boys are taken? *B&S freak.* very true, but I felt the need to change the lyrics to fit my preference. although I think some boys look smashingly good, I don't feel the slightest tingle for any people of my own sex.
|
|
|
Post by alice in wonderland on Mar 5, 2007 22:29:00 GMT
the best looking girls are taken the best looking girls are staying inside I <3 Belle & Sebastian. But is it not the best looking boys are taken? *B&S freak.* I am also pretty much married to a B&S freak. That brings me to my frustration. Last year, I met a lovely boy whilst camping (he's a big Patrick Wolf fan too, but we had a passionate debate about TMP, which he dislikes ) at a hippie commune in the middle of Scottish countryside. Unfortunately, I live in Glasgow, he lives in Aberdeen (laaaaame). Well, live d in Aberdeen. He's currently away on a six month trip to India. When he comes back, he'll be back in Abers for a couple of weeks, and then he's moving to the Weege for permanents to go to uni. We're pretty serious about each other. He took me home to Aberdeen to meet his folks, who were nice to me. So, yeah, he's pretty serious about me. So far he's not met my family. It's just frustrating because he's been away for two weeks and it's like he's been gone forever. I mean, previously, due to the distance, we didn't see each other much, once or twice every couple of months. Still, at least he was in the same country (only four hours away on the bus!). We're not really together (never have been - he was great at the casual sex thing until he met me, apparently). We were just sort of seeing each other until he went away. I went to stay with him for a few days in early January, and he was all, "Yeah, I understand you have your needs... So if you want to see other people when I'm away, I'll understand. If you end up being with one of them seriously and you don't want me when I come home, I'll understand. Be heartbroken, but I'll understand. But I want you to know that I have been completely faithful to you." ... Yeahhhhhh. How am I supposed to respond to that? Anyway, yeah, that's one part of the huge saga that is my lovelife. Other threads and strands of it floating about here and there that I am mostly trying to ignore in the name of concentrating on passing the exams that I have coming up. It's very difficult. My body is like, "Rarr, go out and make babies! Get sex, go!" Finally, I am a genuine bi/pansexual, having been in serious relationships and casual relationships with both sexes and some people who don't quite qualify as either. High five for me. well it seems there shouldnt be too much trouble until you meet someone else you like... have you?
|
|
|
Post by Daniellalala on Mar 6, 2007 19:30:53 GMT
my ex and I are still very much in love but he can't do the long distance thing. I miss him liek absolute mad. Thought going out with someone else would make things easier and I would get over him but this guy is posessive, arrogant and critical. And he is one of my circle of friends. And I am back in london on monday and seeing the ex! rah.
|
|
|
Post by Clare on Mar 6, 2007 22:29:16 GMT
well it seems there shouldnt be too much trouble until you meet someone else you like... have you? Yeah, sorta. Well, I was really into this girl I knew. She liked me. We had sex after seeing each other informally for a couple of months. She's now starting to get really serious about me and saying she wants to see me again and be with me and be my girlfriend; but I've explained that I don't want to be with anyone but Sam (the boy I am H-O-H for) and that I'm just not really looking for committment. In fact, when we started seeing each other, we agreed that neither of us wanted to committ, just to have fun. I keep telling her as gently as I can that I am not interested in a relationship (and, in fact, and this is going to sound so horrible, I have lost some interest in her) but she's not only a mate but she's also in the same organisation as me. And we both sit on the NEC (bit organising dealy) and so I see her at meetings and events and stuff. And she keeps pestering me to get together with her. Which is even more of a turn off. And a good friend of mine told me he wants me to pop his cherry, but I'd feel bad because he is lonely and wants a relationship - and, even though he knows the situation I am in with Sam - I would feel so horrible about having sex with him (ergo taking his virginity) and then getting back together with Sam very shortly after (the next time I see this friend will be mid-summer when we go camping, and Sam comes home on the 17th August). Oh, and I've sort of developed a crush on a gay fifteen year old boy from Edinburgh. I am fail.
|
|
|
Post by heathcote on Mar 6, 2007 22:33:35 GMT
i know it's like "OH NO HEATHCOTE, THAT IS SUCH A PROBLEM" - but i'm such a whore I need to slow down this year, i just came out of a year+ relationship at the start of this year and kinda had no friends, so i made myself feel better about myself by being with lots of people in a short space of time, and it made me left really empty and i don't know if i got myself into trouble or anything...
|
|
|
Post by heathcote on Mar 6, 2007 23:21:50 GMT
yeah, it's so easy to feel unloved...
|
|
|
Post by josemutiny on Mar 6, 2007 23:28:36 GMT
the is poetry^
|
|
|
Post by yojimbo on Mar 7, 2007 0:14:53 GMT
Is it just as easy to love someone if you don't love yourself? I've always wanted to know that.
|
|
|
Post by heathcote on Mar 7, 2007 0:19:46 GMT
Love's so open and so subjective that things like that can never really have an answer. I kinda had to end my last relationship because I felt i didn't know what love was well enough to be in a relationship, I think young people only really go out in order to experement, well, a few other reasons, but the purpose of going out when you're so young is to find out who you are, what you like, what other people are like...experence...
Teenager love is fleeting because they're ever changing, growing up, and i think for that it gets a bad rep, but I belive teenagers capible of loving someone just as much as adults.
|
|
|
Post by resurrectart on Mar 7, 2007 0:23:08 GMT
Why does my boyfriend sometimes think I am only dating him because he buys me stuff?!
*sigh*
|
|
|
Post by josemutiny on Mar 7, 2007 5:25:09 GMT
^^ because thats the ultimate fate for a straight male, in society. whether it be presents or supporting them and the kids. date/marriage relationships break down to money.
|
|
|
Post by resurrectart on Mar 7, 2007 5:47:53 GMT
He doesn't actually think it.. or so he says.. he just gets weird and paranoid about it. And yes, society has changed in that aspect, a lot.
|
|
|
Post by josemutiny on Mar 7, 2007 6:34:13 GMT
I don't think society has changed. theres a perception that women are free. they can support themselves. But the reality is that they make less money than a man. Women like to say they are equal but we accommodate for them so much.
Time off if they have a baby. I don't care its not my baby. Time off to take care of sick kid. Hire a babysitter. School field trips. Let them be. guess who has to pick up the slack for them. other people.
**Plus marriage is only beneficial to the poor.
I believe that two people in love should be able to not only live in different homes with there own incomes but to not get married because all a marriage license is saying, is that if you break this contract, then your breaking the law. so you will pay.... And who pays? the man does.
Women like to say they are equal but we accommodate for them so much.
|
|
|
Post by admin on Mar 7, 2007 7:47:41 GMT
I believe that two people in love should be able to not only live in different homes with there own incomes but to not get married because all a marriage license is saying, is that if you break this contract, then your breaking the law. so you will pay.... Then it's a good job that people in love can do whatever the fuck they want then, isn't it? Marriage is a choice, not an obligation. As for your 'views' on women, I sometimes can't tell whether you're being controversial for controvery's sake, or whether it's all part of some elaborate joke that I don't really get. Because your sixth form gothisms are nowhere near as well thought out as they'd need to be in order not to get shot down. I don't know what happy, happy utopia you live in where women are allowed to take so much time off and still keep their jobs, but that's not how it works in the UK... Cheerio, Michael. xxx
|
|
|
Post by heathcote on Mar 7, 2007 7:53:43 GMT
I agree with Michael. Even if it were true that women get a significant amount of time off if they have a child, I don't belive that that would be at all 'us men accoumodating too much' - and in fact, at least in the U.K, after the baby is born the man gets just as long a leave from work as the woman. So, unless you're complaining at the fact that women get preggggers, then your point dun even make sense.
|
|