|
Post by jay on Mar 24, 2010 18:08:28 GMT
that may be so, but finding something offensive is subjective and like i said, i'd rather err on the side of caution.
|
|
|
Post by sarah on Mar 24, 2010 18:10:59 GMT
my favourite censor was Patrick Wolf-Hannah Montana
|
|
|
Post by helwin tins on Mar 24, 2010 18:12:51 GMT
my "favourite" was censoring my screenname to "flower of womanhood".
|
|
|
Post by Lemon Bloody Cola on Mar 24, 2010 18:13:37 GMT
^my all-time favourite Sibz username.
|
|
|
Post by lastgoodbye on Mar 24, 2010 18:17:53 GMT
Instead of 'Patrick Wolf Forum' the page titles now say "Wolfboard" and this makes me happy.
|
|
|
Post by helwin tins on Mar 24, 2010 18:18:34 GMT
there have been so many.
|
|
|
Post by sarah on Mar 24, 2010 18:19:47 GMT
Instead of 'Patrick Wolf Forum' the page titles now say "Wolfboard" and this makes me happy. but what if someone walks past and sees you are using a "Wolfboard", they might think you are on a forum for wolves, and you are not a wolf, what are you doing on this forum
|
|
|
Post by husbandwifeheroin on Mar 24, 2010 18:21:52 GMT
Wolves can't even type.
|
|
|
Post by lastgoodbye on Mar 24, 2010 18:22:20 GMT
Less embarrasing than being caught on the forum for Patrick Wolf Oh noes I'm a mod, I'm not supposed to say that anymore.
|
|
|
Post by jay on Mar 24, 2010 18:34:51 GMT
i'm still looking for someone to help anna with modding the community room, get back to me if you'd like to do this.
also still looking for another boarder whose nationality isn't french or german to help with the non-english speaking section (i'm looking at you, swedes(NILS.)/spaniards/russians/japanese/italians!) as above, get back to me.
|
|
|
Post by helwin tins on Mar 24, 2010 18:38:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by lastgoodbye on Mar 24, 2010 18:40:26 GMT
AWWH. The first person to start a spoof fan forum for him wins.
|
|
|
Post by helwin tins on Mar 24, 2010 18:41:37 GMT
i really don't like having all the film/tv/music threads loose. it's too untidy. would it be ridiculous to make another room for them? ("culture room" maybe?)
|
|
|
Post by sarah on Mar 24, 2010 18:43:42 GMT
YES PLEASE
|
|
|
Post by jay on Mar 24, 2010 18:52:40 GMT
general consensus a page or so ago was to scrap the sub-sections of this area... now you want them back? after i've moved all of them in here? seriously?
|
|
|
Post by helwin tins on Mar 24, 2010 18:55:02 GMT
general consensus? wasn't that just josh? i've never wanted them loose because as i said before, you can decide to have them like that yourself from edit profile.
|
|
|
Post by jay on Mar 24, 2010 18:57:01 GMT
^ not just josh. florence and anna (and myself) agreed as well.
|
|
|
Post by irrelevant on Mar 24, 2010 18:57:14 GMT
neither the common room or the subforums move fast enough that way. it's a gall-darn necessity that they're grouped.
we cannot improve the momentum of the board/bored if people don't see other people posting right in front of their face.
|
|
|
Post by jay on Mar 24, 2010 18:58:39 GMT
^ good point. the main thing is, no one really wandered into the sub-sections much. one was overtaken by spambots, the others were only really posted in by a choice few. i like the way it's all lumped together, kind of really fits the meaning of the phrase 'common room'.
|
|
|
Post by helwin tins on Mar 24, 2010 19:01:22 GMT
it's messy. and now the majority of threads in the common room are about music stuff, which is not what it's purpose is. also, if it were a room it wouldn't be a sub-section by default. have a vote.
|
|