|
|
Post by Elderberry Fucking Fanta on Jun 19, 2007 18:06:29 GMT
Since there is a lot of fuss about injokes and such, I figured a thread for sorting the business out might be handy. If you have a question (Q) about an in-joke or feature that you don't understand, post it here. If deemed OK by someone in on, or in understanding of the in-joke, the answer ((possible)A) will be found in here.
Eh?
<4<5<6 wolfboardz!
|
|
|
|
Post by youwantthis on Jun 19, 2007 18:08:43 GMT
Delete this shizzle.
|
|
|
|
Post by Elderberry Fucking Fanta on Jun 19, 2007 18:09:56 GMT
If I was a mod, I would delete it. Your post, that is. |
|
|
|
Post by tesla on Jun 19, 2007 18:10:59 GMT
I think it's a nice thread. Too bad I didn't type my explanation post in here instead.
|
|
|
|
Post by blake on Jun 19, 2007 18:11:14 GMT
Good idea.
I'll start, what the fuck is a Sexfield when it's at home.
|
|
|
|
Post by youwantthis on Jun 19, 2007 18:14:11 GMT
If I was a mod, I would delete it. Your post, that is. Crikey. That was uncalled for. What a cu.nt. |
|
|
|
Post by lltoastll on Jun 19, 2007 18:14:19 GMT
Q: What's the deal with the <4?
|
|
|
|
Post by Elderberry Fucking Fanta on Jun 19, 2007 18:15:37 GMT
Q: What's the deal with the <4? <4 is one up from <3. And so forth. |
|
|
|
Post by blake on Jun 19, 2007 18:16:16 GMT
ANSWER MY SEXFIELD QUESTION!
OMG ZOINK!
|
|
|
|
Post by mimicry on Jun 19, 2007 18:17:05 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Lauren on Jun 19, 2007 19:06:15 GMT
I like the <4 <5 etc. 3's can get a bit dull.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebekah on Jun 19, 2007 19:19:12 GMT
I cannot remember where I read it, but I think Sexfield comes from when people were imagining what the video for Get Lost would be?
|
|
|
|
Post by mimicry on Jun 19, 2007 19:30:48 GMT
I cannot remember where I read it, but I think Sexfield comes from when people were imagining what the video for Get Lost would be? I answered that question further up the thread.  |
|
|
|
Post by Rebekah on Jun 19, 2007 19:31:15 GMT
YOU KNOW I'M REALLY OBSERVANT...
I'm going to pretend this didn't happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lauren on Jun 19, 2007 19:32:51 GMT
I have no idea what you're talking about, teneraestnox...
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebekah on Jun 19, 2007 19:33:13 GMT
I know, right? It's working already.
|
|
|
|
Post by sophie on Jun 20, 2007 12:23:11 GMT
can anyone quote a reference from an msn chat when throwing the shoe was first mentioned?
thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by birdwhistle on Jun 20, 2007 16:07:49 GMT
Haha. Well... it must predate The Great Mac-Crash Of 2007, because the earliest mention I have of it (thank you Spotlight) seems to suggest it's been going on for much longer than we might have thought, dear colleagues.
MYSTERY.
|
|
|
|
Post by blake on Jun 20, 2007 16:12:25 GMT
haha you people are geeks. Geeks about YOURSELVES haha.  |
|
|
|
Post by lltoastll on Jun 20, 2007 17:21:09 GMT
Meryl when was that?
I think I recall the first incident to be sometime around the CD release date at the ICA?
February 26th?
Because I told Sophie to throw her shoe at Patrick, let me investigate!
|
|
